Manchester United Rumours Member Posts


Suku Langa's Profile

Current Avatar:
Suku Langa's Avatar
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



Suku Langa's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Suku Langa's Posts



To Suku Langa's last 5 banter replies


Suku Langa has no Rumours Posts



Suku Langa has no Banter Posts



Suku Langa has no Rumour Replies



Suku Langa's banter replies


Click To View This Thread

30 Jul 2017 16:12:38

What absolute nonsense.

1. Walker certainly isn't all-that, but average he is not. He's more than decent player that immediately improves City. What City paid for him I don't see how that makes Walker more or lesser of a good player.

2. Danilo indeed struggled to make RM's eleven. a Madrid team far superior than City. Many good, very good players can't start at the elite clubs but would WALK into most other good teams 11s (City, Chelsea, PSG etc) .

By your "logic", Sanchez, Fabregas, Isco, Pedro were not worth buying cause they were benchwarmers. Impeccable logic there.

3. Mendy. Again you've made absolutely NO argument here about why this purchase isn't all-that but instead prattle about the obvious. Every player comes with little to no guarantee and will (DUH! ) OBVIOUSLY need to settle. Lindalof is no exception. as is Salah, Rudiger, Lacazzete. Again, your mention of his fee adds NOTHING to the point.

4. Assuming you referring to Bernado Silva, how do you figure they "don't" need him? Interesting how you not critiquing the player's merit but his acquisition. Needless to say, Silva is a VERY good player who significantly bolsters City's attack and, obviously, depth.
Whichever view your biased lens gives you, City's first eleven and bench is stronger for this signing.

5. How they going to fit them all? In what. first eleven. squad? If the former, then what a daft, needless question. They won't. But am sure "Fraudiola" as you call him is allowed substitutions and to rotate his squad. Better to have a Danilo, Sterling, Bertrand (potentially) coming off the bench than Young, Blind (make-shift), Valencia/ Darmian.

6. Arsenal done "nothing"? Yeah, of course. Adding a very competent left back and excellent, clinical forward is doing "nothing".
And Arsenal may yet again do "nothing" by adding Lemar. They may lose Sanchez of course. May.
We don't know. Transfer window not closed. How about you actually chill your bones and wait lad?

7. Spurs haven't been active. Is the transfer window closed yet?

8. Liverpool. World beaters. Preseason.
Yeah if course. That's such a brilliant insight. The world never knew not to read much into preseason games until the genius Mort pointed it out. Daft, really.

2 games a week? Yep, all those years Chelsea, Utd were winning PL and same time strongly competing in the CL must of been me dreaming.

The irony of you saying Silva was not "needed" and then making this "point" about Liverpool's wheels coming off having to play two games a week.

I get the nature of fans to be biased. What I can't get is their propensity to be utterly daft. as aptly examplified by you Mort.

And the thing is, I'm not even a Manchester City fan. I didn't need to be to see the folly of your post. But go on. I see the cheer leaders here clapping and cheering you on. Doesn't change the fact that your daft though.

Suku Langa