Manchester United Banter Mobile

 

Use our rumours form to send us manchester united transfer rumours.

(single word yields best result)
 

16 Aug 2026 17:02:32
City very poor today but Arsenal were impressive. United need to press as a team like they did. Gave City no space or time.

0


16 Aug 2026 18:20:37
Let's get over Hull and Ipswich 1st. 🤣
I see Arsenal as red-hot favourites, but it's not easy playing as champions.
If Arsenal do falter, it's wide open, imo.
It's the most open it's been for years; lots of question marks over all the big sides, with the exception of Arsenal.


I think all the other traditional big clubs have new coaches, so there will be ups and downs for them all.
I think it will be as close a season as we've had for a long time.
I don't know why, but I think Arsenal will not find it easy.

3


16 Aug 2026 19:12:29
I disagree. I think Arsenal will walk the league this year. They are so far ahead of everybody else.

And I wouldn't be surprised if Chelsea finish second.

2


16 Aug 2026 19:22:38
Agree with above. Arsenal's strength in depth, quality and continuity will have them miles ahead. As for the rest, who knows, but I won't be shocked to see Chelsea and Spurs in the top 4 and having good seasons. I expect City will drop off, but not off a cliff; too much quality. As of now, that's my top 4.

0


16 Aug 2026 19:27:52
Fallguy, Arsenal have had the best squad for the last 3 seasons. They could walk the league, but I think they are going to continue to be hamstrung by their coach. He seeks out drama like a heat missile, and he just doesn't seem to trust the team to express themselves.

Maybe they'll push on from last year and dominate, but I don't see it.
As for Chelsea: to finish second, everything would have to fall on place for them, but they could do it for sure.

1


16 Aug 2026 21:18:43
Arsenal, Liverpool, City, I think, top three in that order. We will be fourth, and I think that Santos and Tielemans are going to make us a lot better than last year. I think these two signings are being slept on somewhat.

Liverpool, I think, will be the team to push Arsenal, with Szlobowhatsit being Player of the Year.

0


16 Aug 2026 21:46:14
Nah Oakbark, Liverpool's defence isn't good enough.

0


16 Aug 2026 23:57:50
They're way ahead as much as it pains me to say it. 😭

0


16 Aug 2026 16:52:33
When Ineos took on football responsibility, a number of ā€œnecessary cut backs and redundanciesā€ were made, yet our club has a management structure of recruitment process which consists of Berrada, Wilcox, Vivell, McCauley, Hargreaves, Sansoni, yet this summer we’ve (to date) only agreed a simple deal for Tielemans, in fairness, the impressive left field signing of Santos and the free transfer of Darlow, plus a couple of youngsters of whom it’s hoped they can have some first team involvement in season 26/27. We’ve yet again and I stress to date not managed to move on enough of the below average baggage this first team manager has inherited. I’m not going to hammer any player in particular as we all have different views on which players contribute regularly the quality expected and who are assets to the playing staff.

My point is that with the senior management listed plus their significant staff and systems below them, how can it be acceptable to the owners that within a week of the season start Carrick is lacking in so many positions for what he needs to compete across all fronts this season. Maybe the Glazers and Ineos are comfortable with this, as a supporter of United, I am not. Ultimately failure this season or next will land with Carrick and not with the people employed (on huge salaries) that are tasked with bringing the right players to our club. I pray this post does not age well between now and the end of the transfer window.

3


16 Aug 2026 19:16:11
It's extremely worrisome that the starting back 4 is likely to be the same back 4 that started the season 4 years ago.

Despite the team struggling over recent years, Dalot, Maguire, Martinez and Shaw are still the first choice back 4. And none of them are anywhere near the required level to be competing for league titles like the club say they want to.

3


16 Aug 2026 19:24:37
Unfortunately, most of our players have not been easily sellable. That's due to mistakes that were made prior to Ineos taking over day-to-day management. Ugarte, Rashford and Zirkzee are not easy sells.

As I mentioned below, the club's net spend of £1.35bn over the last 10 years is the highest in all of football. We've bought too high, paid too much salary, and have not got value on the playing field.

So, we need upgrades in many positions. Resources may be limited, but there's no way all we can afford is a net spend of £30m in this window. If that's what it comes to, then it's by choice and nothing else.

Like everyone else, I'll be disappointed if we don't buy anyone to fill the obvious holes in the next two weeks. If we don't, and the season goes south, the management team will deserve all the criticism it gets.

1


16 Aug 2026 19:31:59
The first-choice back 4, with all fit, is
Mazraoui, de Ligt, Martinez, Shaw. That's 2 players that weren't here 4 seasons ago. Martinez has been in 2 WC finals. He most certainly is good enough, despite some of the nonsense spoken about him - the issue is fitness.

But, I agree on the other 3 who are likely to see significant minutes this year. We need at least one fullback, arguably two.

0


16 Aug 2026 19:38:44
If it goes south, it will be pinned on Carrick. The same as it being pinned on Amorim last year. Wilcox should have followed Amorim out the door. He's the one that pushed so hard for Amorim that it pushed our director of football out of the job.



If there's one thing that can be said about Glazer era United, it's that the suits will always find a way to throw the manager under the bus to save their own necks.

1


16 Aug 2026 19:45:25
I hope we will get 3 in before the window shuts Kramskeeh.
I understand people's frustration. Its the same every year.
I didn't expect anything very different to where we are.
We all want what more. I expect more from our management team. But I've no idea what's going on so don't see the point in being over critical until the window shuts. If we have not got 2 or 3 in then I would be disappointed and critical.
There are too many unknowns to be jumping up and down at this point.
We are no different to any of the other teams.

Liverpool need 2 or 3 more and will sign them.
Spurs will sign a couple more forwards.
Even city are looking for a couple more and not got them done yet.
Arsenal signed 5 players in the last couple of days last summer and went on to win.
I like the 3 guys we've got in. 2 very good midfielders and a solid back up keeper.


Ideally we get 5 more in, 🤣 but that's not going to happen.
Its proving hard to shift both rashford and zirkzee which is making it hard to address the attack and we do need a striker but we can't keep adding bodies without exits and if they won't move or there are no takers there is not much that can be done. Hopefully they get some offers they like and will move on.
Im not happy that mount is reliable enough, and even if he is, has not got the defencive profile we are missing in midfield. So i'd like to see a defencive cm in
Obviously a lb.

I think we are desperate for a rb just as much as a lb.
Cb should also be a priority.
If we fill 3 of those positions and shift zirkzee and rashford i'd see it potentially as a very good window.
Fail to do that and I'll be disappointed.

1


16 Aug 2026 20:18:35
I honestly can't see United bringing anyone of a decent level in. Maybe another youth player.

It's correct, there are still 2 weeks to get something done. But why leave it so late? Is it another typical United window where the team loses the first few games and they panic buy some galactico on the last day?

0


16 Aug 2026 20:45:49
First, it was "it's not even August yet", then it was "come on guys, August just started!", then it was "4 more weeks", then "3 more weeks", now it's "2 more weeks"...

I am usually positive about the club, but not this time.



I honestly think this is very bad, and it's making me want to know when the people who defend the management will just admit it?

1


16 Aug 2026 21:28:44
The thing what's most disappointing is the lack of ambition.

They give a good talk but are yet to walk the walk, all the pr bs and all the positivity can only last so long.

Be it pre-season, the last two games have been terrible. Any half decent side will cause us issues, our defence is imo terrible and 3 of 5 cbs cannot be trusted to stay fit, we've one senior left back.

I don't know why we hang onto players for so long, City have managed to sell two players they got last summer who had stinkers.

Maybe I can't compare as the two sold still have a high ceiling to reach.

But it's very worrying again. We get champs football and no ambition shown to want to push on and close the gap.

All the so called big teams, bar Arsenal, have new managers.

People seem to forget Liverpool won the title the season before last and invested 400 million plus into the team. Unfortunately for slot they went backwards, their squad still has some very good players.



Chelsea have spent and have built something for their new manager, bringing in 11 players.

City will still spend as they have done in the last 18 months, over 700 million and counting.

Rumours circulating there is a difference in opinions yet again with that tit Wilcox and Vivel, who doesn't want to sign players based on data led information, instead wants to interfere and go with what he sees.

He should have gone along with Amorim.

I won't fully explode until the window has shut, but if they think this squad with only 2 signings added to what you would say to push for a starting spot then they are in trouble.

Why we struggle so hard to sell players is a mystery.

Two promoted sides up first and the type of teams we have in the past struggled to overcome.

I hope behind the scenes they know what they are doing.

1


16 Aug 2026 22:45:50
I highly doubt they do. Already putting out excuses as to why Chelsea, etc., can spend, but we can't. No doubt, there'll be endless reasons given, but the reality is they could do more, but are choosing not to. We need 2 minimum, cm and lb. Don't get that, and I fear it could be a long season.

0


16 Aug 2026 09:08:08
Been away for a while so not sure if we have done predictions for this season yet, so here are mine.

1. Arsenal
2. Chelsea
3. Man City
4. Tottenham
5. Man United
6. Liverpool
7. Aston Villa

League Cup: Man City
FA Cup: Chelsea
European Cup: Bayern Munich

For United, I don't think we have bought well enough in the transfer market and the two games a week will definitely become a strain as the season goes on. Our season really on depends on how well Bruno plays.

2


16 Aug 2026 09:51:40
Think I'd go something along these lines too tbh. For United to improve, we'd need to finish second and I don't see that in a month of sundays as things stand. For me, a CL spot and progressing to this season's knock-out stages should be the aim.


Biggest transformation for me this season will be Spurs, who are probably now a direct rival for a top 4 spot.

2


16 Aug 2026 09:56:06
1st: Man United
2nd: Chelsea
3rd: Man City
4th: Arsenal
5th: Aston Villa
6th: Liverpool

League Cup: Chelsea
FA Cup: Man United
Champions League: PSG

Now, you might call me mad, which is fine, but... Arsenal are a one-trick pony, and that trick, I think, is about to be stopped by refs this season.

Chelsea, I don’t think, are that amazing, but I think the rest of the pack aren’t perfect either. Some good signings and a very good manager, with no Champions League, will help them a lot.



City - Pep gone, Rodri gone. As good as Anderson is, he is no Rodri, and City (even under Pep) struggle without the Ballon d'Or winner.

So that leaves United. This is with the caveat that we sign a top level left back and some more midfield cover. If we do that, then I think we’ve actually got decent squad depth in all positions. I don’t think we’ll do amazingly in Europe, but I have a funny feeling that 21 is coming.

2


16 Aug 2026 10:39:23
I would wait until the window closes before guessing. As things stand, I think we would struggle to get into the top 5. I do think Spurs have a very good chance of finishing above us right now. Really good manager and strong, ambitious signings.

4


16 Aug 2026 12:04:30
Our defence is very static, regardless of who plays at the moment, but I'm optimistic otherwise.

1


16 Aug 2026 14:45:24
Our defence is so leaky. Two full-backs get out of position too easily, and either we have a choice at centre back of two young players who lack experience, or a combination including one youngster, Maguire, who has no pace.

Then, in midfield, we still lack a dominant player, and up front we have Sesko, who hasn't played for months, so won't be match fit for at least a month.

Lastly, is it realistic to expect Bruno to have as good a season as last? I think teams will be all over him.



So, even with three more signings who would take time to bed in, I think Europa League is where we will end up.

All that said, if we do get three top signings, then this year may give the platform for a real go at the title next year, but by then Bruno will definitely need competition as our lead creator of chances.

2


16 Aug 2026 17:48:54
Don't know what makes you think Spuds will finish top 4. They'll barely scrape top 10. I think the whole league will be hard to predict. I can't see City doin aswel, Arsenal same. I think Chelsea maybe outside contenders if Alonso plays it well.

0


15 Aug 2026 21:19:24
Admittedly only naff opposition, but our Kone, on loan at Lausanne, has assisted one and scored a worldie in his last appearance. I hope he has a stellar season and emerges as an option for us either from January (because we haven't signed another) or next season.



I know some will say he hasn't kicked on, but prior to his eye injury he was definitely the one to watch from the academy. I hope this season he emerges from that injury which set him back a season.

4


15 Aug 2026 20:33:00
Typical overreaction. It was only Amorim, be is a crap manager.

Can anyone see what is happening.

We have a manager who has a vision yet when that vision is laid out in front of the owners they baulk at the concept of signing player required to fulfill that vision. Said manager leaves to be replaced with a yes man.

Yes man goes on run, secures Champions League football, which was going to be secured anyway.

However yes man is ecstatic to be here and won't upset the apple cart, as it is his UTD that he played for and why would be do that. The owners are happy, they have the puppet to use what he has and not ask for too much.



They have their fall guy.

Maybe he gets out of the group, maybe he secures top 4 this year.
If he does amazing! If he doesn't they dump him and bring in the next manager to support them financially enough to see progress. That progress leads to a gelled team that nabs Champions League, and the requests for players are turned down and the No man upsets the apple cart. In comes the next yes man.

All becoming a bit too predictable these days.

Or.

We could be fine, take the league by storm and be champions in May!

5


15 Aug 2026 21:55:34
Rinse and repeat.
They didn't want to back Amorim, bought in to play a system, but didn't want to invest in making that system work. Are they backing this manager? He's being set up to fail like so many before him.


We've seen our spending go down when we secure Champ League football, and it looks like so far that will be the case in this window.
It's funny how no other club has a problem paying fees for players they want.

4


15 Aug 2026 22:08:08
Since 2019 the club has accrued £375m in losses. If the debt is going to be reduced, resulting in lower interest charges, then that has to change. A start has been made, but it's going to take years to rectify the cumulative financial damage caused by incompetence, exacerbated by Covid. The club needs to see a good trend. So, yes, they're going to try and hold the line on transfers and wages, which is not to say there will be no other signings in the next two weeks. There may well be.

Over the last 10 years the club has spent £2bn gross on transfers and £1.35bn net, which is the highest in football. I don't make much of this claim that they make the Champions League and then pull back.

All I see is a decade of managerial incompetence. The club has spent enough money to be qualifying regularly.

That said, you would think that the difference between making the Champions League and not is so financially significant that they would be prepared to splash out on at least one highly significant player this window. They can certainly afford to spend another £100-£150m this window and with a decent Champions League run a proper profit this coming season for the first time in 7 years while putting themselves in a position to continue on the right path the following year.

3


15 Aug 2026 23:15:19
That's the point, New Name.
Why do they keep the process going? Why not...

1. Have the transfer and wage structure in place.
2. Build the academy up to be a net positive for players for the first team, or revenue to pay down the debt, or increase spending to develop the first team, or all three.
3. Support a manager capable of delivering the style of football United is accustomed to from their 2 sustained periods of success.

Of course, we, as fans, oversimplify the situation.



In the background, they may very well be executing the above steps, albeit they had a slight rewind due to Amorim imploding.

They could have found a gem in Carrick, and we are at the start of a third sustained period of success. He had the momentum and form at the back end of the season to suggest we could very well be in the mixer this season.

I hope they have done. I'll support the team and manager, as I do at the start of every season, and I'll try not to become negative too early!!

2


16 Aug 2026 03:43:20
I feel like this is turning into a perennial complaint, but tragic lack of midfielder and back up striker aside. We really have got pretty crap fullbacks. In the modern game, fullbacks can transform a team, and I really hope we get a first choice leftback. We probably need a first choice right back too, but I don't even think the most irrational fan is expecting that.

Shame.

Shaw has been terrible this pre season, and he cannot play two games a week, or 5 games in 5 weeks in a non World Cup year. Let's hope this game was the wake up call we needed.

3


15 Aug 2026 19:16:41
It’s a pre-season friendly, fitness is key. That’s it.

However,
1. Does the close of the window feel a whole lot closer to you than it did four hours or so ago?
2. Do clubs now think we are just a bit more desperate than we were four hours or so ago?

Losing a pre-season game happens, but it feels like we have just exposed ourselves to being more desperate for signings, the chairman of selling clubs upping the price.

The arrogance of Sjr, Wilcox and co. may get more tested, after that result, than when we were relaxed previously.

The bigger picture is the result doesn’t matter, unless you hated Amorim, yet the overall focus just sharpened. The club this window has been arrogant. The real games start next week but the incompetence started when the season finished and the penny pinching started.

4


16 Aug 2026 08:59:48
The miscalculation is that we could get the midfielder we wanted below £80m. Very quickly it became obvious that the midfield market was £100m+ for anyone decent, so we went for two squad players rather than a first choice player and hoped one of them works out.

2


15 Aug 2026 17:51:03
That wasn’t ideal, not going to massively overreact but it highlighted that we need a destroyer in the middle and a new lb. To start another season with Shaw is criminal and will bite us soon. No way he will last the season and if he continues in his current t form he will cost us games.

12


15 Aug 2026 18:39:23
Spot on, Tim.

4


15 Aug 2026 19:50:43
LB and RB. We certainly have issues at CB when both our first choice players are out. Heaven is a decent 3rd choice, and Yoro will play games too, but Maguire won't do. It's preseason, and it was 2 games in a week, so it's definitely not worth reading too much into it beyond confirmation of what we knew already.

4


15 Aug 2026 17:31:58
Well this is dreadful. This amazing world class LB we have seems to be really rubbish, like he's done the past 12 years! Fridge losing his man for the 3rd goal too, bin him. Genuinely garbage. Failed to win 4 of the pre season games now and schooled by Amorim. How tf could you look at this squad in may and say yep, Tielemans and Santos are enough, this is a f'in joke!

Id be slightly at ease if we had Pep, Klopp, Enrique etc but a failed Boro manager? Lol, this is ending in tears like it did with Ole, call me negative all you want but this yes man won't win us f all.

This is dreadful planning again by those in charge, we should just shut up and be happy and positive that we'll be 14 years without a title come may. You cannot win the f'in league with Shaw and Maguire at the back and the Fletcher twins, Mount rashford and zirzkee as your back ups.

7


15 Aug 2026 17:52:02
I mean, it's a friendly, so shouldn't read too much into it, but getting battered by Amorim is embarrassing. Maybe he wasn't the problem.

8


15 Aug 2026 17:53:20
It's always the same old story. When we're chasing Champions League qualification, they spend. As soon as we have it, the purse strings are drawn tight.

At this rate, it's going to be a long old season.

5


15 Aug 2026 18:00:40
Okay, not ideal, and only one clean sheet in six isn't great, but blimey, Scholes, talk about overreaction. šŸ˜‚
Cantonas seagull, many, including myself, didn't consider Amorim to be the sole problem.

6


15 Aug 2026 18:10:51
Nah, it's fine, we don't need new signings, especially not early enough, so they could have enough time to adapt!

Actually, you know what, Rashford is like a new signing! He hasn't played for the club for two years, he is now a fresh new player we can use!

6


15 Aug 2026 17:31:42
Pretty bad performance against Milan. Very sloppy. This was against a Milan team under Amorim that hasn’t won a pre season game. A Milan team that Chelsea best 3-0.

I know it’s only pre season, and the result doesn’t really matter. But this is likely the team to start the season, and they created very little and gave up lots of chances.



I’m hopeful it’s just a blip, and once the game means something, they will turn it on.

But one thing is for sure, Luke Shaw is a liability at defending!

3


15 Aug 2026 17:49:19
He has been for years.

3


16 Aug 2026 03:47:03
He rarely steps over the halfway line, so he's a liability attacking as well.

1


15 Aug 2026 10:52:57
Let's mix things up a little from the transfer talk and discuss how this team that Carrick is building might actually look/play on a regular basis.

For example, lots of us (myself included) feel we need another midfielder, but who should be out starting midfield and why?

I get that it's a squad game, but ultimately a regular first 11 always emerges with them playing 80-90% of the time (certainly in the meaningful games when available).

So we currently have Mainoo, Tielemans, Santos, and Mount (technically we have Ugarte but he will be out for most of the season).

For me the only one I think will be almost nailed on to start regularly is Andrey Santos. Which given that Tielemans is such a big signing for us and Mainoo is our star midfielder might seem a little odd. Yet for me he is the one who has a totally unique skillset that cannot be replicated or covered for by the the others.

He alone is a natural No.6, a defensive midfielder who can shield the back four and play out consistently from the back. He is also the only one who you can't question his mobility and work rate. Without him I think every other possible combination looks a little lightweight, and lacking natural defensive awareness.



Which means our midfield will likely depend on who we pair with him, will it be Mainoo or Tielemans.

Obviously both will play, but who will start more often than not?

Most of us who want another midfielder signed also wanted Mainoo to be starting more last season. Yet even without another signing it looks like Mainoo will face a tougher fight for first team football this season.

Personally I'm torn, I want to see Mainoo play, but I know that right now Tielemans is the better player of the two, and why sign a 29 year old in their peak only to bench them for a 21 year old. Also is it sensible to have a midfield made up of a 22 and 21 year old, especially if we are likely to have at least one 20/19 year old at CB behind them. That's a real lack of experience right through the spine (especially when you consider that Lammens only has one season of top level league experience, and Sesko is going to be the starting striker).

So who do you think will be the regular starting midfield duo, and why?

5


15 Aug 2026 12:44:28
Good question. Mainoo is no doubt talented, he really, really needs to increase his defensive output, he's bottom 40% for duels won and possession won. He's bottom 20% for progressive passes completed.

You would imagine it will be Santos and one of Tielemans or Mainoo, depending on the opposition.

Santos and Tielemans are much more balanced, and we are, however, lacking a left-footed midfielder.

I like the idea of Lewis-Skelly coming in, he's got everything we need. I'm not sure the club will spend that kind of money though.

2


15 Aug 2026 13:13:27
The advantage of Lewis-Skelly would be he kills two birds with one stone, covering both midfield and left-back.

But, he'd be an expensive addition to be a modern-day John O'Shea.

1


15 Aug 2026 14:05:57
Only 3 Arsenal players started 80% of their games last season.
Most players don't start more than 40 games a season.

1


Manchester United Banter 2


Manchester United Banter 3


Manchester United Banter 4


Manchester United Banter Archives


 

Posting / Reply Form

To post you must be logged in with a username. Please Log In or Register for a username.


 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass  
 
Change Consent